- Mr.Simple
4 my only girl brandon fraley .
- Timmons, MWF
the leading ideas of contextual semantics are these: (1) the truth of a sentence is a matter of its correct assertability . (2) correct assertability, at least for ordinary descriptive sentences, is normally a matter of the often complex interaction of two factors: (a) the various normas and practices that govern a certain mode of discourse and (b) the world. (3) unlike the correspondence view, a mode of discourse often employs assertability normas that do not require, for the truth of sentences constituting that discourse, objects or properties in the world to directly answer to the sentences' singular terms, unnegated quantifier expressions, or predicates; nor need there be any dedicated facts in the world that correspond to the sentence. (4) furthermore, the norms and practices for correct assertability are not monolithic within a language; rather, these norms and practices vary from context to context depending on such factors as the sort of discourse in question (scientific, aesthetic, moral, and so forth) and the specific purposes the discourse is serving at the time. (5) although truth, in this view, is a normative notion, the view is not a form of verificationism (sometimes called, pragmatism): truth is not radically epistemic; correct assertability is not the same as warranted assertability (even ideal warranted assertability). (p. 116)
（“objects”や“properties”等の大文字表記は、真理の対応説において言語（単称名辞、述語、…）と対応するものとされているmind-independentな存在者を表している
|
